Who Consists of the Journal Editorial Board? The Intellectual Compass of Publication and Refereeing
The highest editorial body that prevents individual decisions from making mistakes and adds intellectual depth and diversity to the journal is the 'Editorial Board'. Especially in thought, literature, academy and culture journals, the editorial board forms the backbone of the journal.
What You Will Learn in This Lesson
- To understand the critical responsibilities and authority limits of the Editorial Board and Advisory Board role in the editorial office.
- Learning the professional collaboration protocol that this role establishes with other editorial roles (GYY, editor, art director)
- Examine the step-by-step methodology that should be applied for zero errors and high editorial quality
1. What is the Journal Editorial Board? Assembly of Collective Mind
The highest editorial body that prevents individual decisions from making mistakes and adds intellectual depth and diversity to the journal is the 'Editorial Board'. Especially in thought, literature, academy and culture journals, the editorial board forms the backbone of the journal.
Editorial board; It consists of the editor-in-chief, section editors and respected writers or academics who contribute to the line of the journal. It provides an institutional and objective evaluation filter that is not confined to a single person's taste or ideological obsession.
2. Basic Duties of the Editorial Board
The functioning of the editorial board is carried out through periodic meetings and collective evaluation processes:
• Determining the Publication Policy and Principles: To decide which intellectual movements the journal will include, its editorial red lines and ethical principles. • Collective Evaluation of Incoming Works: To vote on acceptance/rejection by discussing controversial, ambitious or voluminous articles that have been pre-screened by the editors at the board table. • Thematic Planning of Future Issues: Creating the subject, research framework and list of authors to be invited for the files to be published after 3-6 months. • Managing Referee and Advisory Processes: Supervising double-blind peer review processes in academic or technical journals.
3. What Should the Editorial Board Meeting Culture Be Like?
A productive editorial board meeting is a democratic workshop where hierarchy is suspended and ideas collide freely. A fresh suggestion from a young editor and the criticism of a senior writer are listened to with the same respect.
Decisions are made by absolute majority or editorial consensus. Constructive feedback notes are prepared for rejected authors.
Expert Perspectives & Foundational Sources
Cemil Meriç defines magazines as 'fortresses of free contemplation' in his works 'This Country' and 'From Culture to Wisdom'. Against the monophonic nature of the book, he argues that the magazine is a community, a school of thought and a living discussion arena.
Key takeaway for this lesson: Publishing a magazine is not just filling out paper; To pursue a cause of thought and to build a common climate of thought.
Practical Application & Field Case
A thought magazine receives a 6,000-word essay from a well-known academic defending a controversial thesis about political history. The section editor likes the piece but worries it could upset some readers and doesn't want to decide alone. They bring it to the editorial board meeting; one member argues the bibliography is weak, while another argues the thesis is bold but worth opening up for debate. Rather than approving it as-is, the board votes by majority to publish it on the condition that the author adds further sources and a short section responding to opposing views; instead of a rejection, a constructive revision note is sent to the writer.
Note: Examples not explicitly cited are educational scenario models designed to illustrate editorial methodology; names and metrics are illustrative.
Critical Editorial Warnings & Common Pitfalls
- The editorial board consists of only symbolic names and does not attend any meetings, or decisions are imposed by a single person.
- Skipping collective evaluation for a controversial piece and deciding based solely on one editor's personal taste damages the magazine's institutional objectivity.
Lesson Summary & Core Takeaways
- The Editorial Board is the highest editorial body that sets the magazine's publishing policy and evaluates controversial works through collective judgment.
- In a productive editorial board meeting, hierarchy is suspended; even rejections come with constructive feedback for the writer.
The Core Principle
Devote at least one meeting a year to the magazine's 5-year vision and its shortcomings and conduct a self-criticism session.
Finished this lesson?
You can proceed directly to the next lesson. Reading bookmarks, resume reading, quizzes, module exams, and verified certificates are unlocked for students accepted to our 100% free Education Program.
Share this programme with someone you know
Digital Publishing Academy is a free programme on magazine writing, editing and publishing. Recommend it to a friend, a team or your followers who are interested in magazines.
When you earn your certificate you can also share it from your profile with its verification link.